Showing posts with label Grammar Help. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grammar Help. Show all posts

Monday, March 9, 2020

R&R: Raves and Rants by Multi-Published Author Amanda Cabot


The Affect of a Hoard on Newly-Sprouted Grass

Did you cringe when you read the title? I certainly did when I wrote it, but I wanted to snag your attention for my rant about confused and misused words.

I’ll be the first to admit that English is not an easy language, but the confusion between homonyms and the misuse of words with similar pronunciations is becoming so common that I had to rant.


There are two badly misused words in my title: “affect” and “hoard.” Let’s start with the easier one, “hoard.” “Hoard” is both a noun and a verb. The problem is that as a noun, it’s often confused with “horde,” although the two have very different meanings.

The Nouns
Noun
Definition
Example
Hoard
A supply or fund stored up and often hidden away
The chipmunk had a hoard of acorns hidden under the tree in preparation for winter.
Horde
A teeming crowd or throng
The hordes of rioting citizens broke store windows and began looting.

See what I mean about the two nouns having very different meanings? And, while Spellchecker will flag many errors, the incorrect use of hoard vs. horde isn’t one of the mistakes it catches.

The Verb
Verb
Definition
Example
Hoard
To lay up a hoard
The chipmunk hoarded acorns under the tree.

Note that the verb has the meaning you would expect. It’s the action of creating a hoard. “Horde” is never a verb.

That was relatively simple. “Affect” is considerably more complex. Like “hoard,” it’s both a noun and a verb. Like “hoard,” it’s often confused with another word, in this case “effect.” The similarities end there. “Effect” is also both a noun and a verb. What makes these two words even more confusing is that the nouns and verbs are not as closely related as you might expect.

When you see the word “change,” whether it’s a noun or a verb, you know that you’re dealing with some type of alteration. The same is true of many other words that are both nouns and verbs, including “hoard.” Unfortunately, that’s not the case with “affect” and “effect,” which is one of the reasons why these words are misused so often.

The Verbs
Verb
Definition
Example
Affect
To put on a pretense
He affected an air of nonchalance he was far from feeling.
To produce an effect
The blizzard affected air travel across the West.
Effect
To bring about
Though she tried, she was unable to effect a change in the company’s hiring policies.

Though both verbs are used in ordinary language, the most commonly used is the second definition of “affect.”

If relationships between these verbs and their nouns were as close as they are for many English words, you might expect the noun “affect” to be something produced by the second definition of the verb “affect,” changing the familiar phrase “cause and effect” into “cause and affect.” That might seem logical, but I never said English was a logical language.

Here are the correct definitions of “affect” and “effect.”

The Nouns
Noun
Definition
Example
Affect
An observed emotional response Note: This is a technical term used in psychology and psychiatry and is rarely used in ordinary speech or writing.
She maintained the same affect throughout her therapy.
Effect
Something that inevitably follows an antecedent, as in a cause and effect
The blizzard had the effect of closing major airports.

It’s only been in the past year or so that I’ve seen “affect” commonly used as a noun, and each time I see it, I shake my head in dismay, wondering why the author chose that word. In many instances, the author used it as a synonym for “appearance,” perhaps thinking that “affect” made her sound more educated. If so, she would have been disappointed in my reaction, because I felt she was like Amy March from Little Women, affecting a level of sophistication she did not possess. (Note that I used the first definition of the verb “affect” in that sentence.)

The good news is that Spellchecker will flag the erroneous use of “affect” as a noun, although it does not distinguish between the correct and incorrect use of either “affect” or “effect” as a verb.

Let’s return to the title of this post. Does “The Observed Emotional Response of a Hidden Store on Newly-Sprouted Grass” make any sense? Of course not. On the other hand, if I’d written, “The Effect of a Horde on Newly-Sprouted Grass,” there would have been no reason to rant, because you’d have had no trouble imagining a crowd causing trampled grass.

Be careful with the words you use. They’re not interchangeable.

~ Amanda

Bio:
Amanda Cabot’s dream of selling a book before her thirtieth birthday came true, and she’s now the author of more than thirty-five novels as well as eight novellas, four non-fiction books, and what she describes as enough technical articles to cure insomnia in a medium-sized city. Her most recent release, Out of the Embers, introduces readers to the fictional town of Mesquite Springs, Texas, where danger just might lurk.”
Her inspirational romances have appeared on the CBA and ECPA bestseller lists, have garnered a starred review from Publishers Weekly, and have been nominated for the ACFW Carol, the HOLT Medallion, and the Booksellers Best awards. A popular workshop presenter, Amanda takes pleasure in helping other writers achieve their dreams of publication.
Find Amanda:




Friday, January 24, 2020

A Recap Of All Amanda Cabot's Raves & Rants Posts

Amanda Cabot, a multi-published author in several genres and would-be grammar guru, has created a series of posts I consider to be keepers. I've printed them out and placed them in my own grammar notebook, and I've heard from many of my readers that they have done the same.

So to make it easy for everyone, I'm listing her posts her along with links. You can bookmark this post or go to each post and print. Either way, these are an invaluable source for help. 


















August 12, 2019 The Common Comma









Bio:
Amanda Cabot’s dream of selling a book before her thirtieth birthday came true, and she’s now the author of more than thirty-five novels as well as eight novellas, four non-fiction books, and what she describes as enough technical articles to cure insomnia in a medium-sized city.
Her inspirational romances have appeared on the CBA and ECPA bestseller lists, have garnered a starred review from Publishers Weekly, and have been nominated for the ACFW Carol, the HOLT Medallion, and the Booksellers Best awards. A popular workshop presenter, Amanda takes pleasure in helping other writers achieve their dreams of publication.
Find Amanda:



Monday, December 9, 2019

R&R: Raves And Rants From Multi-Published Author Amanda Cabot


The Final Rant

As the title says, this will be my final rant or at least my final scheduled rant. As much as I’ve enjoyed discussing grammatical errors and seeing your reactions to the posts, I’m reaching the end of my list of subjects. And, just as importantly, I discovered a book that explains grammar far better than I could hope to. If you haven’t already read Dreyer’s English by Benjamin Dreyer, I suggest you put it on your absolutely-positively-must-read list. It’s both entertaining and informative.


Today’s post will be a potpourri, filled with items that have annoyed me but weren’t substantial enough to warrant individual posts.

Mismatches
The rule is simple. A singular subject requires a singular verb. If the subject is plural, the verb must also be plural. Then, why did I find the following in print?
·         A little spit and shine on the outside and some renovations on the inside was all that was needed.
   We clearly have a plural subject here – “spit and shine” plus “renovations” – so the verb should also be plural.

What do you think about this sentence?
·         Gone were the boyish good looks and in its place was stunning rugged appeal.
I have no problem with the singular verb in the second half of the sentence, since the subject of that clause is “stunning rugged appeal,” which is singular, but I take exception to “in its place.” The author obviously knew that “good looks” was plural, because she used “were” in the first clause. Why, then, didn’t she say “in their place”?

Improbable Dialogue Tags
You know what I mean by dialogue tags, don’t you? They’re the “he said/ she saids” that precede or follow a line of dialogue. Correct dialogue tags include “whispered, asked, exclaimed” and a host of other verbs, all of which describe an aspect of speaking. Sometimes, though, I encounter sentences like the following.
·         “Jane packed your bag,” Susan nodded to the nylon suitcase in the corner.
·         Steve smiled, “Your dog is climbing on the chair again.”
What’s wrong with these? A person cannot nod or smile a line of dialogue. Correcting these errors is simple: substitute periods for the commas, creating stage directions rather than dialogue tags.

Misplaced Clauses
We’ve discussed clauses in the past, but a refresher never hurts. To avoid ambiguity or sometimes amusing errors, clauses need to be placed next to the nouns they modify.
·         Mother predicted an angel would fall out of the sky meant just for Jake.
Did the author mean to say that the sky was meant for Jake? I doubt it. The meaning would have been unambiguous if the author had said, “an angel meant just for Jake.”

Here’s another:
·         She forced herself not to look in Antonia’s direction who was nearly twenty years Michael’s junior.
Not only is this awkward, but the direction is NOT twenty years younger than anyone. Why didn’t the author simply say, “in the direction of Antonia, who was …”?
Miscellaneous Errors
·         The both of them were seated at the table.
What’s wrong with that? “Both” is a pronoun. It does not – repeat after me, it does NOT – need an article before it. You wouldn’t say, “the either of them,” would you? The sentence should begin with either “Both of them” or “The two of them.”
·         She reverted her gaze back to the path.
Does that bother you? “Revert” means to return, so there is no need to add the word “back.” It’s superfluous.

Anachronisms
We’ll end with one of my pet peeves, an anachronism. This is from a book that takes place in an aristocratic London household in 1861. The duchess is addressing a servant and asks, “What part of ‘no’ was not clear?”

Did you laugh? I did, but I also stopped reading the book at that point and made a mental note to avoid everything written by the same author. That’s hardly the reaction the author wanted, but it is the reason I’ve written these posts. I don’t want you to make mistakes that will cause readers to laugh for the wrong reasons.

Grammar is important. I’d go so far as to say that good grammar is the hallmark of a professional author, and that makes it essential. If you’re not confident that your grammar is correct, read Dreyer’s English or hire an editor, but, please, please don’t make me laugh at your mistakes.

Amazon

~Amanda



Headshot Of Amanda Cabot
Bio:
Amanda Cabot’s dream of selling a book before her thirtieth birthday came true, and she’s now the author of more than thirty-five novels as well as eight novellas, four non-fiction books, and what she describes as enough technical articles to cure insomnia in a medium-sized city. Her inspirational romances have appeared on the CBA and ECPA bestseller lists, have garnered a starred review from Publishers Weekly, and have been nominated for the ACFW Carol, the HOLT Medallion, and the Booksellers Best awards. A popular workshop presenter, Amanda takes pleasure in helping other writers achieve their dreams of publication.
Find Amanda:

Amanda's Latest Book:
A young woman with a tragic past has arrived in town . . . and trouble is following close behind

Ten years after her parents were killed, Evelyn Radcliffe is once more homeless. The orphanage that was her refuge and later her workplace has burned to the ground, and only she and a young orphan girl have escaped. Convinced this must be related to her parents’ murders, Evelyn flees with the girl to Mesquite Springs in the Texas Hill Country and finds shelter in the home of Wyatt Clark, a talented horse rancher whose plans don’t include a family of his own.

At first, Evelyn is a distraction. But when it becomes clear that trouble has followed her to Mesquite Springs, she becomes a full-blown disruption. Can Wyatt keep her safe from the man who wants her dead? And will his own plans become collateral damage?

Suspenseful and sweetly romantic, Out of the Embers is the first in a new series that invites you to the Texas Hill Country in the 1850s, when the West was wild, the men were noble, and the women were strong.

Pre-Order Amanda's Latest Book Now:




Monday, October 14, 2019

R&R: Raves & Rants With Amanda Cabot


Rants and Raves Banner

Me, Myself, and I

I know that I promised you another lesson on commas this month, but when I saw what felt like an egregious error in a writer’s magazine, I decided it was time to rant again. I won’t identify the magazine, nor will I give you a direct quote, because I don’t want to embarrass anyone, but the essence of the sentence that made me want to crumple the page and toss it into the wastebasket was, “Members of the audience asked myself many questions.”

Did that bother you? If you’re a grammar purist, it should have.

Wood doll with a bothered face


Why? Myself is a reflexive pronoun. So, too, are yourself, himself, herself, itself, ourselves, yourselves, and themselves.

Are you rolling your eyes at the term “reflexive pronoun”? Yes, I know this is grammar-speak, but a brief definition may help you understand the reason for my rant. According to my dictionary, “reflexive” means “directed or turned back on itself.” The same dictionary defines “reflexive pronoun” as “a pronoun referring to the subject of the sentence, clause, or verbal phrase in which it stands.” The key element in this definition is “referring to the subject.”

Green polka dot circle turning back on itself
Reflexive pronouns can be used in a sentence as either direct or indirect objects, to indicate aloneness, or for emphasis. Let’s look at an example of each.

·         When I finished the chapter, I decided to reward myself with a chocolate milkshake.
In this case, “myself” is a direct object. Although it would, in theory, be grammatically correct to say “to reward me,” the reflexive pronoun is infinitely preferable.

·         When I finished the chapter, I made myself a chocolate milkshake.
Here, “myself” is the indirect object. I (subject) made the milkshake (direct object) for myself (indirect object.)

·         When I finished the chapter, I made a chocolate milkshake by myself.
Do you see the difference between this example and the previous ones? I haven’t told you whether the milkshake is for me or someone else. Instead, by saying “by myself,” I’ve made the point that I did this alone rather than having help.

·         I made the milkshake myself.
While this is similar to the previous example, there’s a subtle difference. In this case, I’ve used “myself” for emphasis. If I’m accustomed to either buying milkshakes or asking someone else to make one, the addition of “myself” tells you this is a big deal.

What do these examples have in common? In each case, “myself” refers back to the subject, which is “I.” These are all correct uses of a reflexive pronoun.

Now, let’s examine the sentence that started this whole discussion, “Members of the audience asked myself many questions.”
·         What is the subject of this sentence? If you answered “members of the audience,” you get a gold star.
·         What role does “myself” play? The correct answer is “object.”
·         So, what’s wrong with the sentence? Very simply, “myself” is the reflexive form of “I”, but since the subject of the sentence is not “I,” it’s misused here. Perhaps the author thought she was using “myself” for emphasis or to make herself seem important. In my opinion, she sounded a bit pompous by substituting the incorrect “myself” for the simple and correct “me.” The only way to make this sentence correct and still use a reflexive pronoun would be to say, “Members of the audience asked themselves many questions.” That, of course, changes the meaning of the sentence.

Let’s look at another erroneous use of a reflexive pronoun.
·         Susan and myself will answer questions after the lecture.
Do you see the problem? “Myself” is being used as part of a compound subject. If you return to the original definition, a reflexive pronoun refers to the subject; it is not the subject. This sentence should have been “Susan and I will answer questions after the lecture.”

Me, myself, and I. The rules are simple.
·         “I” is the subject of a sentence.
·         “Me” is the object, either direct or indirect.
·         “Myself” is a reflexive pronoun and can only be used when the subject of the sentence is “I.”

A chart for the rules of using Me, Myself, I

Clear? I hope so.
~Amanda

Headshot Of Amanda Cabot
 A lifetime of reading and writing, not to mention a host of teachers who believed that good grammar was one of the essentials of life, have given Amanda Cabot such firm opinions about the printed word that I asked her to share some with us in her Raves and Rants posts.  

Cover Of A Tender Hope by Amanda CabotAlthough her working career was in Information Technology, Amanda achieved her dream of selling her first novel before her thirtieth birthday and is now the author of more than thirty novels as well as a number of books and articles for Information Technology professionals.  

Her most recent book, A Tender Hope, is the final book of the Cimarron Creek trilogy.

Find all of Amanda's books, newsletter info and social media links here.